I predicted one to, compared to coeducational college or university children, single-intercourse college people will have highest sex salience (H

_{step 1}), fewer other-gender friends (H₂), and higher anxiety in mixed-gender situations (H₃). Prior studies have not found any consistent moderating effect of student gender on the differences related to single-sex schooling, and we expected the school differences to be similar in boys and girls (H₄). Nevertheless, we included student gender as a potential moderator as most prior studies did [4,13]. Across the two samples, we predicted that differences between single-sex and coeducational school students ple as the school differences may attenuate when all students were exposed to similar mixed-gender environments after graduation (H₅). Also, we hypothesized that the potential school difference in mixed-gender anxiety was mediated by gender salience (H_six) and mixed-gender friendships (H_seven).

Members.

Players were recruited off four regional higher colleges (that all the-ladies, one to all-people as well as 2 coeducational) situated in demographically diverse areas when you look at the Hong kong. Participants provided Setting step one in order to 6 (7 th to help you twelve th level) people apart from new most of the-people school, at which Mode six students was indeed excluded because of the school’s plan to possess societal exam preparation. Questionnaires was basically given by the a class professor within the for each and every group. Members done measures with the mainly based variables and you will stated their month-to-month family relations earnings, parental studies and you can age, quantities of sisters and you can brothers, and you may ethnicity. This research was done in conformity on the suggestions and you can acceptance of the University off Hong-kong Individual Research Integrity Committee (HKU HREC). Students’ assent and you may inactive agree out-of mothers or guardians was indeed acquired before studies range. Most of the victims gave written advised concur according to the Statement regarding Helsinki.

A total of 2083 students participated in the study (participation rate: 84%). Twenty-four subjects were excluded from analyses due to missing or extreme data (11 coeducational school students did not indicate their gender and 13 students reported extremely unlikely values on demographic variables). The final sample (N = 2059, M_age = years, SD = 2.03) consisted of 589 boys and 376 girls from the two coeducational schools, 416 boys from the all-boys school, and 678 girls from the all-girls school. This sample size had over 99% a priori power to detect small differences (.20 < d < .30) at ? = .05, two-tailed . Participants were mainly Chinese (89%). Among the four participating schools, the all-boys school and one coeducational school were in Band 2, while the all-girls school and the other coeducational school were in Band 3. All participating schools used Chinese as the teaching language. Some schools used spoken Cantonese and some used spoken Mandarin in class, but they used the same written language in formal printed materials. Therefore, the questionnaires were printed in Chinese. Consistent with prior research [3,4,8], participants from single-sex schools had parents with higher education level, t(2042) = -7.157, p < .001, and attended more academically excellent schools, t(2023) = -, p < .001, unequal variances, than did participants from coeducational schools. The average parental education level of the sample (i.e., between junior secondary to senior secondary) was similar to a representative sample of over 9000 students from local high schools, one from each of the 19 districts in Hong Kong . Detailed participant characteristics are presented in Table 1.

Intercourse salience scale.

Gender salience is actually measured because of the McGuire et al.’s approach . It scale is proven is of the or inspired of the sex structure [twenty seven,53]. Users have been questioned to offer three brief solutions to every off those two issues: “Let me know what you’re” and you will “Tell me what you’re not”. These people were trained to write down whatever they you are going to remember quickly. This http://www.datingranking.net/myladyboydate-review new solutions had been following coded just like the “gender-related” otherwise “non-gender-related”. Table 2 suggests examples of this coding program. Solutions was basically first coded separately of the several coders. Inter-rater reliability are higher for everyone solutions (every ? > .93). Disputes were after that solved by the conversations between the two coders. The complete quantity of sex-associated responses along side a couple of inquiries is actually summed to indicate gender salience.